← Back to all bills

Support Private Property Rights

EngrossedErin Pare (R)House2025–2026 Session
AI Generated

This bill clarifies that including real property on a comprehensive transportation plan that is not financially constrained does not require disclosure to buyers or sellers in real estate transactions, nor is it considered a material fact. However, parties still cannot knowingly make false statements about whether a property is included on such a plan.

Arguments in Favor

Supporters argue this bill protects property owners and buyers from unnecessary concern about speculative transportation projects that may never be funded or built. They contend that inclusion on a non-financially constrained plan does not indicate an imminent threat to property, and removing this disclosure requirement reduces regulatory burden on real estate transactions while still preventing fraud through the prohibition on knowingly false statements.

Arguments Against

Opponents argue that properties included on transportation plans face genuine uncertainty about future development, and buyers and sellers should have this information to make informed decisions about their property values and future use. They contend that removing this disclosure requirement undermines transparency in real estate transactions and could disadvantage buyers who are unaware their property may be targeted for future roads or infrastructure projects.

AI-generated analysis based on bill text. Always verify with official sources at ncleg.gov. This is not legal or political advice.

Sponsors

Cosponsors (11)

Vote Breakdown (1 roll call)

Final Vote

House Initial PassageApr 2, 2025

On: Second Reading

Passed
93
Yea
24
Nay
0
Not Voting
3
Absent
93 Yea24 Nay
Republican64 Yea·5 Nay
Democrat29 Yea·19 Nay