← Back to all bills

Emer. Care/Animals/Vet. Practice

EngrossedEdward Goodwin (R)House2025–2026 Session
AI Generated

This bill allows emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to provide emergency medical care to injured police K-9 units and certified search and rescue dogs at emergency scenes without needing a veterinary license. It also protects EMS personnel from prosecution when they provide such emergency care in good faith, though this protection does not apply to cases involving gross negligence, wanton conduct, or intentional wrongdoing.

Arguments in Favor

Supporters argue this bill enables faster lifesaving care for working police and search and rescue dogs that are injured during emergency operations. Proponents contend that EMS personnel are already trained to assess and stabilize injured beings and should be able to apply basic emergency care to these animals without legal barriers, potentially preventing deaths or worsening of injuries while waiting for veterinary care.

Arguments Against

Opponents may worry that allowing non-veterinarians to treat animals could result in inappropriate care or worsen an animal's condition if EMS personnel lack animal-specific medical training. Some may also question whether the good faith immunity provision is broad enough to protect EMS workers or creates liability concerns, and whether this sets a precedent for other animals or situations beyond the specific scope of police and search and rescue dogs.

AI-generated analysis based on bill text. Always verify with official sources at ncleg.gov. This is not legal or political advice.

Sponsors

Cosponsors (27)

Vote Breakdown (1 roll call)

Final Vote

House Initial PassageApr 30, 2025

On: Second Reading

Passed
110
Yea
0
Nay
2
Not Voting
8
Absent
110 Yea0 Nay
Republican67 Yea·0 Nay
Democrat43 Yea·0 Nay