The Frontline Mental Health Support Act

Arguments Against

Opponents may question whether $13 million in annual state spending is the best use of limited budget resources, especially when other mental health needs exist statewide. Some may argue the program should be funded through employer or insurance contributions rather than general taxpayer funds, or that the 12 sessions per year may be insufficient for those with serious mental health crises. Others might note that similar confidential mental health benefits could be addressed through existing employee assistance programs or private insurance rather than creating a new state program.