Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-02-17

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill requires that any new state legislation creating health insurance mandates (such as requiring coverage of specific treatments or services) must also repeal an equal number of existing mandates and appropriate funds to cover the new mandate's cost. It applies to both private health insurance plans and the state employee health plan, with an exception if an actuarial analysis shows a mandate would actually decrease costs.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill increases transparency about healthcare costs by forcing lawmakers to explicitly account for the financial impact of insurance mandates.
• •They contend that mandates drive up premiums for employers and consumers, and that requiring the repeal of old mandates before adding new ones prevents unlimited growth in required coverage that increases costs without benefiting those who don't need those specific services.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue this bill could prevent important health protections from being added to insurance plans, such as coverage for specific treatments or preventive services, by making it harder to expand benefits.
• •They may also contend that the bill treats all mandates equally without distinguishing between those that serve essential health needs versus less critical coverage, and that it could limit patient access to necessary care by prioritizing cost reduction over coverage comprehensiveness.