Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-02-11

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill requires state environmental agencies to consider the cumulative impact of proposed permits on low-income and minority communities when making permitting decisions across mining, solid waste, hazardous waste, air quality, water quality, and coastal development projects. It also mandates enhanced public participation, including at least one public hearing held in affected overburdened communities with 60 days' advance notice for new or expanded facilities.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill addresses environmental justice by preventing the concentration of polluting facilities in communities that already bear disproportionate environmental burdens.
• •They contend that low-income and minority communities have historically been targeted for industrial development, resulting in higher rates of pollution-related health problems, and that this law ensures their voices are heard in permitting decisions and provides legal protections based on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents worry this bill could delay or prevent legitimate industrial and development projects by adding subjective criteria to permitting decisions, potentially increasing costs and uncertainty for businesses.
• •They argue the bill's definition of 'disproportionate adverse impact' is vague and could invite litigation, and that it may discourage economic investment and job creation in rural and less-developed areas where some of these facilities are needed.