Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Pharmaceutical Full Disclosure Act
Primary Sponsor
Harry WarrenRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-02-11
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to include specific information in advertisements for prescription drugs and biological products shown to North Carolina consumers. The required disclosures include the FDA approval date, the date the drug became available for purchase, and detailed information about clinical trials related to any required side effect warnings, such as trial length, number of participants, and frequency of side effects.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill helps consumers make informed decisions by providing concrete data about drug safety and efficacy directly in advertisements.
- •They contend that current ads mention side effects but lack the specific trial details needed to understand how common or serious those risks truly are, and that transparency about approval timelines helps consumers assess how long a drug has been on the market.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue this requirement creates burdensome compliance costs for manufacturers and could make advertisements cluttered or difficult to present within time or space constraints in media like television or radio.
- •They might also contend that federal FDA regulations already require adequate safety disclosures and that additional state-level requirements could complicate advertising across multiple states or duplicate existing protections.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.