Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S73Change ✕
Richlands Occupancy Tax Authorization
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Michael LazzaraRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref to Finance. If fav, re-ref to State and Local Government. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-02-17
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill authorizes the Town of Richlands to impose a tax of up to 3% on hotel and short-term rental accommodations. Revenue from this tax would be managed by a newly created Tourism Development Authority, with at least two-thirds used for tourism promotion and the remainder for tourism-related projects in the town.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this tax provides a dedicated funding source for tourism marketing and infrastructure that can attract more visitors and business travelers to Richlands, boosting the local economy and hotel industry.
- •The tax targets visitors rather than residents, and the revenue can fund projects that increase accommodation usage and make the town a more attractive destination.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend that the tax increases costs for visitors staying in Richlands hotels, potentially making the town less competitive compared to nearby areas without such taxes.
- •Some may also question whether a 3% occupancy tax is necessary or whether the town's limited tourism market can support the administrative structure required to collect and manage these funds.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.