Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H106Change ✕
Revive High-Need Retired Teachers Program
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Richard CarverRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Appropriations2025-04-16
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill revives a program that allows retired teachers to return to work in high-need schools (Title I schools or schools with D/F grades) without losing their retirement benefits. Retired teachers in STEM and special education fields can earn higher starting salaries, while those in other subjects earn entry-level pay. The program requires IRS approval and includes $10 million in annual state funding.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this addresses teacher shortages in struggling schools by bringing experienced educators back to classrooms without financial penalties.
- •Retired teachers provide stability and expertise, particularly in critical STEM and special education areas.
- •The program incentivizes participation through higher pay steps for shortage areas and allows retirees to supplement their fixed incomes while serving students in high-poverty or low-performing schools.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may worry about the $10 million annual cost to state taxpayers and whether these funds could be better used to hire younger, career-track teachers or improve teacher compensation generally.
- •Some question whether the program truly addresses root causes of teacher shortages or creates a two-tiered system.
- •There are also concerns about the short-term nature of one-year contracts and whether this reduces incentives for permanent teacher recruitment and retention in high-need schools.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.