Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-19

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment to change how the State Board of Education is structured and led. Instead of being appointed by the Governor, most board members would be elected by voters in districts for four-year terms, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction would serve as the board's chair. Voters would decide on this amendment in November 2026, with changes taking effect in 2028.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue that electing board members makes education policy more accountable to voters rather than concentrated in the Governor's office.
• •They contend that this gives communities a direct voice in education decisions and aligns the superintendent—who is already elected statewide—as the natural leader of the board, creating clearer leadership and responsibility.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents worry that electing board members could make education policy overly political and subject to campaign messaging rather than expertise.
• •They also argue that the current appointed system allows for careful selection of qualified candidates and maintains stability through overlapping terms, while elected positions may create frequent turnover and difficulty attracting experienced educators to serve.