Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref to the Com on Education - K-12, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-12

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill increases the criminal penalty for stealing from temporary housing (like tents, trailers, or mobile homes) during a declared state of emergency. Theft from temporary housing becomes a Class F felony instead of a Class H felony, while theft of other property during emergencies remains a Class H felony. The bill also allows victims to sue for triple damages plus court costs and attorney fees.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects vulnerable people who have lost their homes during disasters like hurricanes, floods, or fires.
• •By increasing penalties for looting temporary housing, the bill deters criminals from targeting people in emergency situations who have already lost their primary residences.
• •Advocates contend that temporary housing deserves enhanced protection because occupants are in their most vulnerable state and the consequences of losing temporary shelter during a disaster are severe.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue that this bill creates an inconsistency in the law by punishing theft from temporary housing more severely than theft of other property during emergencies, raising questions about equal protection.
• •Some may be concerned that a Class F felony is a significant escalation that could result in lengthy prison sentences for property crimes, and that prosecution resources might be better spent on other emergency-related crimes.
• •Critics might also question whether different penalty levels for different types of looting are necessary or if a uniform felony standard would be more appropriate.