Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H199Change ✕
Nonconsensual Booting and Towing Reform
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Reece PyrtleRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Finance2025-06-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill creates a new regulatory framework for nonconsensual booting and towing of vehicles on private property in North Carolina. It establishes the Towing and Recovery Commission to issue permits, set maximum fees, maintain a public database of towed vehicles, and enforce requirements for signage, vehicle storage limits, and payment methods.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects consumers from unfair towing practices by capping fees, requiring clear signage so vehicle owners know the risks, creating a searchable database to quickly locate towed vehicles, and setting standards like limiting storage distance to 25 miles and requiring acceptance of multiple payment methods.
- •The regulatory oversight helps prevent predatory practices while still allowing property owners to address parking violations.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill increases regulatory burdens and costs on towing businesses through permit requirements and compliance obligations, potentially raising prices for consumers.
- •Some may contend that fee caps and operational requirements reduce business flexibility, that the 25-mile storage limit may be impractical in rural areas, or that the new commission adds government bureaucracy without clear evidence such regulation is necessary.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.