Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
The Kelsey Smith Act
Primary Sponsor
Ben MossRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-04-16
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
The Kelsey Smith Act authorizes wireless telecommunications carriers to provide call location information to law enforcement officers without a warrant in two emergency situations: when a device was used to place a 911 call, or when there is reasonable suspicion the device belongs to someone in immediate danger of death or serious physical harm. The bill also requires wireless carriers to register emergency contact information with the State Bureau of Investigation to facilitate these requests.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill enables faster emergency response by allowing law enforcement to locate people in life-threatening situations without the delay of obtaining a warrant.
- •They contend it could save lives in cases involving missing persons, kidnappings, or individuals in medical emergencies, while still limiting requests to specific emergency circumstances.
- •The bill protects wireless carriers from legal liability when they comply in good faith, encouraging cooperation with public safety.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents express concern that the 'reasonable suspicion' standard for emergency situations is vague and could be broadly interpreted, potentially allowing location tracking without traditional legal safeguards like warrants.
- •They worry the provision may enable surveillance overreach and set a precedent for eroding privacy protections, particularly for vulnerable populations.
- •Critics also note the bill allows carriers to voluntarily disclose location data beyond these emergency situations, which could expand tracking without clear limitations.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.