Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref Com On Appropriations2025-03-04

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill appropriates $217 million for disaster recovery from Hurricanes Matthew and Florence, establishes detailed monthly reporting requirements to the legislature and State Auditor on how these funds are spent, creates a public dashboard comparing appropriated versus expended funds, and requires that recipients of state disaster aid attempt to obtain insurance settlements and federal aid first, with any alternative funds obtained being returned to the state.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill ensures accountability and transparency in how taxpayer money is spent on disaster recovery by requiring frequent detailed reporting to lawmakers and the public.
• •They contend the reporting requirements, audits, and dashboard help prevent waste and allow the legislature to oversee the executive branch's spending.
• •Additionally, requiring recipients to pursue insurance and federal aid first ensures state funds are used efficiently as a last resort rather than duplicating other available assistance.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue that the extensive monthly and weekly reporting requirements create administrative burden that could slow down actual disaster relief work and recovery efforts.
• •They might also contend that requiring recipients to repay the state if they receive insurance settlements or federal aid could discourage people from pursuing those claims or create disincentives for timely assistance.
• •Some may view limitations on the Governor's budget authority as constraining executive flexibility in responding to ongoing recovery needs.