Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S176Change ✕
Allow Counties to Sign MOU
EngrossedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Ralph HiseRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-06-10
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows the sheriff's offices in Mitchell County and Yancey County, North Carolina to enter into agreements with the Unicoi County, Tennessee sheriff's office to conduct joint law enforcement operations across state lines. The agreements must specify how liability for damages will be handled and must be reported annually to the North Carolina Department of Justice.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill enables more effective law enforcement by allowing neighboring counties in different states to cooperate on special operations and criminal investigations that naturally cross state boundaries.
- •The bill protects North Carolina counties by requiring liability terms to be clearly defined in advance and by limiting the state's financial exposure from cross-state operations.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may be concerned about potential jurisdictional conflicts when law enforcement officers operate across state lines, or about whether adequate oversight mechanisms exist to ensure accountability.
- •There could also be questions about whether the liability protections sufficiently shield taxpayers, or whether state-level coordination should be required rather than allowing individual counties to make independent agreements.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.