Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Restore Down-Zoning/Farmland & Floodplain
Primary Sponsor
Jennifer BalkcomRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Judiciary 3, if favorable, Housing and Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill restores Henderson County's authority to initiate down-zoning (reducing permitted land uses or development density) without property owner consent, but only for two specific purposes: farmland preservation in agricultural districts and floodplain mitigation in federally designated flood hazard areas. The bill applies retroactively to December 11, 2024.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects valuable farmland and reduces flood risk by allowing local governments to implement necessary land-use restrictions without needing unanimous property owner approval.
- •They contend that farmland preservation and floodplain management serve important public interests—maintaining agricultural lands and preventing future flood damage—that benefit the broader community, not just individual property owners.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue this bill limits property owners' rights by allowing government to restrict land uses without consent, which they view as a taking of property value without compensation.
- •They contend that owners should have control over how their land is zoned and used, and that local governments may over-use these exceptions to down-zone property beyond the stated purposes of farmland or flood protection.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.