Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Affordable Housing in Rural Areas
Primary Sponsor
Shelly WillinghamDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Housing and Development, if favorable, Judiciary 1, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill modifies how North Carolina allocates low-income housing tax credits by requiring the state to prioritize affordable housing development in rural communities and counties with higher poverty levels. It establishes specific scoring criteria, such as measuring distance to amenities by radius rather than driving distance and favoring high-poverty areas when projects have equal scores.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses the affordable housing shortage in rural North Carolina by directing resources to underserved communities that struggle to attract development.
- •By adjusting distance calculations and prioritizing high-poverty areas, the bill aims to ensure tax credits reach projects that serve the most vulnerable populations and revitalize economically disadvantaged regions.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend that the bill's specific requirements could limit flexibility in allocating credits to the most viable or impactful projects and could reduce efficiency by using radius-based measurements instead of actual road distances.
- •Some may argue that overly restrictive criteria could discourage developers from participating or lead to projects in locations with fewer existing services, potentially limiting access to amenities despite lower distances on paper.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.