Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-05-06

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill creates a legal presumption that a person littered if litter is found bearing their name on documents or objects such as bank statements, utility bills, or prescription bottles. The presumption can be challenged in court, and the bill excludes advertising and campaign materials from triggering this presumption.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill makes it easier to prosecute litterers by allowing their identity to be established through items found with their personal information, saving time and resources in enforcement.
• •They contend it deters littering by increasing the likelihood of consequences and helps protect public spaces and the environment from illegal dumping.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents worry the presumption could unfairly burden people whose personal documents were stolen, lost, or discarded by someone else without their knowledge.
• •They also express concern about privacy implications and whether the rebuttable presumption adequately protects due process rights, as people would need to affirmatively prove they didn't litter rather than the state proving they did.