Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H264Change ✕
Wire Fraud Prevention Act
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Julia HowardRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Commerce and Economic Development2025-04-08
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill modifies North Carolina's wire transfer fraud laws to require banks to verbally verify payment orders with customers and beneficiaries, and to refund a portion of unauthorized payments more quickly. It also adds protections for large deposits made to newly opened accounts by delaying payment for 10 business days.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects consumers and businesses from wire fraud by requiring verbal verification of transactions, which can catch fraudulent orders before funds are transferred.
- •The faster refund requirements and account protections help victims recover losses more quickly and discourage criminals from targeting new accounts with large transfers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that mandatory verbal verification adds operational costs and delays for banks and customers conducting legitimate transactions.
- •The 10-business-day hold on large deposits to new accounts could harm legitimate businesses and individuals needing immediate access to funds, and critics may question whether these provisions effectively prevent fraud or simply shift the burden without solving the underlying problem.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.