Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref to the Com on Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-05

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill removes restrictions on labor organizing and collective bargaining, prohibits non-compete agreements for employees earning under $75,000 annually and no-poach agreements between employers, and directs a study to identify and reform unnecessary occupational licensing requirements. The bill aims to increase worker mobility and job market competition while maintaining public safety protections.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill removes barriers that trap workers in low-wage jobs and prevent them from advancing their careers or starting businesses.
• •They contend non-compete agreements unfairly restrict worker freedom, that occupational licensing requirements often exceed what is necessary for public safety, and that repealing labor restrictions allows workers to collectively negotiate better wages and working conditions.
• •Supporters believe these changes will increase competition, lower consumer costs, and create economic opportunities particularly for lower-income workers.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents worry that eliminating non-compete agreements could harm business investments in employee training, as companies may be reluctant to invest in workers who can immediately leave for competitors.
• •They argue that repealing labor organizing restrictions and no-poach agreements could lead to labor market instability and that aggressive licensing reform could compromise public safety in regulated professions like healthcare and construction.
• •Opponents also contend that some occupational licensing protects consumers by ensuring professionals meet quality standards, and that a study-based approach may ultimately result in less stringent protections.