Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Eliminating "DEI" in Public Education
Primary Sponsor
Michael LeeRepublicanLast Action
Ch. SL 2026-202026-06-24
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill prohibits North Carolina public schools from teaching, promoting, or requiring professional development related to what it defines as "divisive concepts" — including ideas that individuals should feel guilt based on race or sex, that meritocracy is inherently racist or sexist, or that character traits should be ascribed to people based on race or sex. Schools must certify annual compliance and cannot maintain offices or employ staff whose primary duties involve promoting these concepts or discriminatory practices.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects students and teachers from being compelled to adopt ideological viewpoints and prevents schools from teaching that individuals bear responsibility for historical actions of their race or sex.
- •They contend it safeguards academic freedom, critical thinking, and merit-based education while ensuring compliance with federal civil rights laws and protecting the $3.1 billion in federal education funding North Carolina receives.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue the bill's broad definitions of "divisive concepts" could restrict legitimate educational content, including honest discussions of systemic racism, historical oppression, and diversity in American history.
- •They express concern that the language is vague enough to chill teachers' willingness to teach controversial historical topics or discuss structural inequities, and that eliminating diversity-focused positions and programs may reduce support for underrepresented students.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.