Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
The Sergeant Mickey Hutchens Act
Primary Sponsor
Jeff ZengerRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-04-16
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows law enforcement, probation/parole, and corrections officers who have earned advanced certificates to purchase up to four years of additional service credit in the state retirement system by paying the full cost upfront. The law applies to both the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System and the Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System, and becomes effective January 1, 2027, pending IRS approval.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this recognizes the advanced training and professionalism of law enforcement and corrections officers by allowing them to enhance their retirement benefits based on their credentials.
- •The bill requires officers to pay the full actuarial cost, so it does not burden taxpayers or other retirees.
- •Employers may also contribute toward the cost if they choose, giving agencies a tool to recruit and retain trained officers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend that allowing officers to purchase service credit they did not actually work inflates retirement liabilities and costs for the retirement systems.
- •Concerns exist about whether this creates an unequal benefit structure compared to other public employees, and whether the actuarial assumptions and anti-selection surcharges adequately protect the long-term solvency of the retirement systems.
- •The requirement for IRS approval suggests uncertainty about federal tax law compliance.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.