Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H279Change ✕
Filling Vacancies/Haywood County Bd. of Comm
EngrossedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Mark PlessRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-01
Vote Breakdown
87 Yea26 Nay2025-04-30
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows Haywood County to fill vacancies on its Board of Commissioners using the standard state process outlined in G.S. 153A-27, rather than a different procedure. The change brings Haywood County into alignment with how 38 other North Carolina counties handle commissioner vacancies.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill creates consistency across North Carolina counties by applying uniform vacancy-filling procedures to Haywood County.
- •This standardization may reduce confusion about the proper process for filling commissioner positions and ensures Haywood County follows the same established state law as most other counties in the state.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that Haywood County's previous process was specifically tailored to local circumstances and preferences.
- •Changing the procedure could affect how the county handles future vacancies and may not reflect the county's preferred method for selecting new commissioners.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.