Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H297Change ✕
Breast Cancer Prevention Imaging Parity
EngrossedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Donna WhiteRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-07
Vote Breakdown
111 Yea1 Nay2025-05-07
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires health insurance plans in North Carolina to cover supplemental and diagnostic breast imaging (such as MRI and ultrasound) with the same cost-sharing as standard mammograms. It also prevents out-of-network providers from billing patients above insurance-approved rates for these breast cancer prevention services.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill improves breast cancer detection by ensuring patients have access to advanced imaging technologies without financial barriers.
- •They contend that women at high risk or with dense breast tissue benefit from supplemental imaging, and standardized cost-sharing removes insurance discrimination that could delay lifesaving care.
- •Additionally, the billing restrictions prevent surprise bills from out-of-network providers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill increases insurance costs by mandating coverage of additional imaging services, which could raise premiums for all policyholders.
- •They may also contend that limiting out-of-network provider reimbursement rates could discourage providers from participating in networks or reduce availability of services in certain areas.
- •Some may question whether all recommended supplemental imaging is medically necessary for every patient.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.