Compare Bills

Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.

Energy Security and Affordability Act

EngrossedSenate
Paul NewtonRepublican

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-18

31 Yea12 Nay2025-03-13

This bill modifies North Carolina's carbon reduction requirements for electric utilities by removing an interim 2030 target and keeping only the 2050 carbon neutrality goal. It also creates a new cost recovery mechanism allowing utilities to increase rates outside standard proceedings for baseload power plant construction costs, if the project shows long-term savings for customers.

  • Supporters argue this bill reduces regulatory uncertainty and financial risk for utilities building large power plants like nuclear facilities, which require massive upfront investments and long construction timelines.
  • By allowing faster cost recovery and removing interim deadlines, the bill may encourage utilities to invest in baseload generation (nuclear and other stable sources) that provides reliable power while meeting carbon goals, ultimately benefiting consumers through grid stability and lower long-term costs.
  • Opponents contend that removing the 2030 interim target weakens climate commitments and allows utilities to delay cleaner energy transitions.
  • They also argue that the new cost recovery mechanism bypasses normal rate-setting oversight, potentially allowing utilities to pass construction costs to ratepayers more quickly and with less scrutiny—even if projects face delays or cost overruns—and may shift financial risk from utilities to consumers.

Search for a bill to compare

Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.