Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Clean Skies Geoengineering Ban
Primary Sponsor
Jeffrey McNeelyRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-12
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill prohibits North Carolina from intentionally releasing materials into the atmosphere to alter temperature, weather, or sunlight intensity through methods like stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud seeding, or electromagnetic radiation. It adds these practices to the state's list of prohibited air pollution activities and requires the Environmental Management Commission to adopt rules to enforce the ban.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that geoengineering experiments could have unpredictable and harmful effects on North Carolina's environment, agriculture, and public health without sufficient scientific understanding or oversight.
- •They contend that the state should prevent these atmospheric modification techniques from being deployed within its borders to protect residents and ecosystems from potential unintended consequences.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the ban is overly broad and could restrict legitimate cloud seeding activities used for drought relief or agricultural purposes that have been used for decades.
- •Some may contend that blanket prohibition prevents North Carolina from participating in research or emergency atmospheric interventions that could address serious climate or weather threats in the future.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.