Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-06-16

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill updates North Carolina's child car seat requirements to specify rear-facing seats for infants, forward-facing seats for older children, and rear-seat positioning until age 8 or 57 inches tall. It also adds arbitration as an option for resolving disputes between insurance policyholders and insurers over uninsured or underinsured motorist claims.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue that stricter, more detailed car seat requirements based on current safety research reduce child injuries and deaths in vehicle crashes.
• •For insurance disputes, proponents contend that arbitration provides a faster, less expensive alternative to lawsuits for resolving disagreements about whether someone qualifies for uninsured/underinsured coverage or what damages they deserve.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may worry that more prescriptive car seat rules create confusion for parents and enforcement challenges, and that the specific height/weight thresholds could disadvantage children who don't fit standard parameters.
• •On the insurance arbitration provision, some argue it could limit consumers' legal protections or favor insurers by allowing disputes to be resolved outside the court system where procedural safeguards exist.