Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Conscientious Objections to Vaccine Mandates
Primary Sponsor
Jennifer BalkcomRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-13
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill adds a 'conscientious objection' exemption to North Carolina's vaccination requirements for students in public schools, colleges, and universities. The exemption allows students or parents to opt out of immunizations by submitting a written statement explaining their conscience-based or religious objections, without needing medical documentation. The bill takes effect for the 2026-2027 school year.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects individual freedom and parental rights by allowing families to follow their deeply held moral or religious beliefs without state interference in medical decisions.
- •They contend that the exemption respects conscience-based objections that may not fit neatly into existing religious categories, giving parents greater autonomy in their children's healthcare choices.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry that broadening exemptions could reduce vaccination rates, potentially weakening 'herd immunity' that protects vulnerable students who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons.
- •They argue that a conscientious objection exemption is broader than religious exemptions and could make it easier for people with non-medical concerns to opt out, potentially increasing disease outbreaks in schools.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.