Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Augment Subcontractor Protections
Primary Sponsor
Jarrod LoweryRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Housing and Development, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-13
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill strengthens protections for subcontractors in North Carolina construction projects by making 'pay if paid' and 'pay when paid' clauses unenforceable, requiring contractors to pay subcontractors within 7-30 days of receiving payment themselves, and imposing 1% monthly interest on late payments. The bill does not apply to residential construction projects with 12 or fewer units.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects subcontractors and workers from being left unpaid when general contractors or property owners fail to pay on time.
- •By requiring prompt payment regardless of whether the contractor has been paid, subcontractors can better manage cash flow and pay their own workers and suppliers without bearing the financial risk of payment delays.
- •This creates more fairness in the construction industry where smaller subcontractors are often financially vulnerable.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents contend this bill may increase costs for contractors who must now pay subcontractors quickly even if they haven't received payment from owners, potentially straining contractor cash flow and causing some to raise prices or require more upfront deposits.
- •Contractors argue they need flexibility to manage payment timing and that 'pay when paid' clauses are a legitimate way to manage risk when dealing with unreliable owners.
- •Some also question whether the 1% monthly interest rate adequately compensates for late payments.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.