Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H390Change ✕
Medicaid Prepaid Health Plan Practices
EngrossedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Carla CunninghamDemocratLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-12
Vote Breakdown
43 Yea0 Nay2026-05-06
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows Medicaid Prepaid Health Plans (PHPs) to require itemized bills for large hospital claims, align their claims processing with national standards, and direct certain hospital services to outpatient settings instead of inpatient settings, while giving the Department of Health and Human Services authority to set guidelines for these practices.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill increases efficiency in Medicaid claims processing by allowing health plans to use industry-standard practices and scrutinize unusually expensive claims for potential billing errors or fraud.
- •They contend that directing appropriate services to outpatient settings can reduce costs and improve patient care by avoiding unnecessary hospital admissions, ultimately making Medicaid services more sustainable.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry that requiring itemized bills for large claims and directing services to outpatient settings could delay necessary care or create barriers for vulnerable Medicaid patients.
- •They argue that these practices might prioritize cost-cutting over patient access to needed hospital services and that national standards may not account for North Carolina's specific healthcare needs or patient populations.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.