Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Clarify Motor Vehicle Dealer Laws
Primary Sponsor
Steve TysonRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-05
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill modifies North Carolina's motor vehicle dealer laws to strengthen protections for franchised dealers. It limits manufacturers' ability to terminate dealership franchises without good cause, restricts conditions manufacturers can place on ownership transfers, requires dealers receive compensation for over-the-air product sales, clarifies dealer succession rights, and ensures dealers are reimbursed for required loaner vehicles and training costs.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects small business owners from unfair treatment by large manufacturers who have significant power over dealers' livelihoods.
- •The bill prevents manufacturers from using threats of termination to force costly facility upgrades or other demands, ensures dealers are compensated fairly when manufacturers sell digital services to their customers, and allows family succession and business transfers to proceed fairly.
- •These protections help maintain local dealership ownership and preserve jobs in North Carolina communities.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue the bill imposes significant new regulatory burdens and costs on manufacturers, which may ultimately be passed to consumers through higher vehicle prices.
- •They contend that manufacturers need flexibility to terminate underperforming dealers and maintain quality control over their brand representation.
- •Some argue the compensation requirements for over-the-air services and loaner vehicles are excessive, and that the expanded definition of "dealer" and "selling" may create unintended consequences for businesses tangentially involved in vehicle sales or service.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.