Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S291Change ✕
Regulation of Short-Term Rentals
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Thomas McInnisRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-17
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill prevents North Carolina cities from banning short-term rentals or imposing certain restrictions on them, while allowing cities to regulate short-term rentals through permitting, occupancy limits, parking requirements, and zoning compliance. The bill aims to protect property owners' rights to rent their homes while maintaining some local oversight through health and safety standards.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects private property rights by preventing cities from prohibiting short-term rentals entirely, which they say allows homeowners to earn income from their properties.
- •They contend short-term rentals benefit North Carolina's tourism economy and provide flexible housing for transitory workers like nurses and tradespeople.
- •Proponents also argue that state-level guidelines create consistency across the 532 cities in North Carolina rather than allowing each city to adopt different restrictions.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry this bill limits cities' ability to manage neighborhood quality and protect residential character, as it prevents bans in specific neighborhoods or restrictions on the number of rental nights.
- •They argue that removing local control could lead to increased noise, parking problems, and safety concerns in residential areas, and that short-term rentals can reduce the availability of long-term rental housing for permanent residents.
- •Critics contend that uniform state rules ignore the unique needs and circumstances of individual communities.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.