Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Marijuana Legalization and Reinvestment Act
Primary Sponsor
Jordan LopezDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-18
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill legalizes cannabis possession and use for adults 21 and older in North Carolina, effective January 1, 2028. It establishes a regulated market for cannabis sales through licensed businesses, creates three reinvestment funds to support communities harmed by cannabis prohibition, and automatically expunges prior marijuana convictions. The bill maintains penalties for sales to minors, impaired driving, and unlicensed operations.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses racial justice by automatically expunging prior marijuana convictions that disproportionately affected communities of color, and by creating funds and preferential licensing for people harmed by cannabis prohibition.
- •The regulated market would replace illegal sales with safety standards including testing, labeling, and potency controls.
- •The bill would generate substantial tax revenue—with 25% funding community reinvestment, 10% supporting cannabis business ownership among historically impacted applicants, and funds directed to substance abuse treatment, youth education, and impaired driving enforcement.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend the bill creates public health concerns by normalizing cannabis use, particularly among young people, despite age restrictions.
- •A 30% excise tax plus local taxes could keep legal prices high, sustaining black market competition.
- •The bill's complexity in defining 'historically impacted applicants' and managing reinvestment funds could create implementation challenges.
- •Some argue the automatic expungement of prior convictions raises questions about how individuals should be treated who were convicted under then-existing law, and that the staggered licensing timeline (180 days for historically impacted applicants before others can apply) may face legal challenges as discriminatory.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.