Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Gaming Laws/Allow Certain Social Games
Primary Sponsor
David WillisRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-15
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows North Carolinians to play certain social games like poker, bridge, mahjong, and canasta with money bets in private homes or community clubhouses without violating gaming laws, as long as no one profits from hosting and games occur no more than once per week. It also increases the number of annual 'game night' fundraising events that nonprofit organizations can hold from four to twenty-four per calendar year.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects personal freedom by allowing adults to engage in traditional social games with friends and family without legal consequences, similar to laws in many other states.
- •They contend it also helps nonprofits and community organizations raise funds more flexibly through game night events, which are charitable fundraising activities with clear restrictions to prevent exploitation.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill could enable illegal gambling operations disguised as private games, as enforcement becomes difficult in private settings.
- •They may also express concerns that increasing game night events from four to twenty-four annually could normalize gambling in communities and potentially create pathways to more problematic gambling behavior, despite the bill's stated safeguards.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.