Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S324Change ✕
2025 Safe Drinking Water Act
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Kandie SmithDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-19
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires North Carolina's Commission for Public Health to establish maximum contaminant levels (safety limits) for harmful chemicals in drinking water, including PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, hexavalent chromium, and 1,4-dioxane. The Commission must complete initial rulemaking by October 15, 2025, and annually review new scientific evidence to update these safety standards.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects public health by setting state-level drinking water standards for toxic chemicals that may not yet have federal limits, particularly protecting vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.
- •Proponents contend that many of these chemicals (especially PFAS) are widespread contaminants linked to serious health risks, and North Carolina should establish clear safety limits rather than waiting for federal action.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that establishing stricter state standards than federal EPA guidelines could increase water treatment costs for municipalities and utilities, potentially raising consumer water bills.
- •Some may contend that the rulemaking process could be burdensome and that federal EPA standards should be sufficient, or that more time is needed to establish scientifically-sound limits rather than the compressed October 2025 deadline.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.