Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Lower Healthcare Costs
Primary Sponsor
John BellRepublicanLast Action
Conferees Changed2026-04-06
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill aims to lower healthcare costs and increase price transparency in North Carolina through multiple measures: requiring hospitals and surgical facilities to publicly report pricing information on common procedures, mandating clear billing disclosures to patients about out-of-network providers, establishing good-faith cost estimates for scheduled procedures, limiting facility fees charged by hospitals, and strengthening prior authorization and appeals processes for health insurance.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses North Carolina's high healthcare costs by increasing price transparency, allowing patients to comparison shop and make informed decisions about care.
- •The bill protects consumers from surprise out-of-network bills and unexpected charges, establishes accountability through mandatory reporting of facility fees, and gives patients tools like good-faith estimates to budget for care.
- •Proponents believe competition driven by price information will incentivize providers to lower costs and improve quality.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend that the bill creates significant compliance burdens and administrative costs for hospitals and healthcare providers, particularly smaller facilities.
- •Concerns include that price transparency alone may not lower costs without addressing underlying structural issues in healthcare, that facility fees have legitimate operational purposes, and that some requirements (like the 5% good-faith estimate variance cap) could be difficult to implement accurately.
- •Some argue the bill primarily shifts responsibility to consumers rather than addressing systemic cost drivers.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.