Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Const. Amendment: Council of State Vacancies
Primary Sponsor
Cody HuneycuttRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-05-20
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would change how the Governor fills vacancies in eight statewide elected offices (Secretary of State, Auditor, Treasurer, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Attorney General, and three Commissioners). Under the new process, when a vacancy occurs close to an election, the Governor must choose from a list of three candidates nominated by the political party of the officer who left office. The amendment would be decided by voters in November 2026.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this process ensures vacancies are filled by qualified candidates aligned with voter preferences, since voters elected someone from that political party to the position.
- •They contend it provides checks on gubernatorial power by requiring party input in the selection process, preventing the Governor from using vacancy appointments to advance a personal political agenda or install candidates from a different party than voters chose.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry this process limits the Governor's appointment power and flexibility in choosing the most qualified person available, potentially forcing selection of less-qualified nominees.
- •They may also argue the three-nominee list requirement could delay filling important offices, burden political parties with finding qualified candidates quickly, and reduce the Governor's ability to respond to specific needs of state agencies during transitions.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.