Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Fairness & Transparency in Education Salaries
Primary Sponsor
Lindsey PratherDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-20
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill reinstates education-based salary supplements for teachers and instructional support personnel (including school social workers) based on advanced degrees, using salary policies from 2013, and allocates $8 million in state funding for this purpose. It also requires local school boards to publicly post salary schedules for occupational therapists and physical therapists on their websites.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses teacher recruitment and retention by rewarding educators who pursue advanced degrees, recognizing their additional education and expertise.
- •They contend that reinstating these supplements makes North Carolina more competitive in attracting qualified educators and shows state commitment to valuing professional development.
- •Additionally, they argue that publishing therapist salary schedules increases transparency and helps these professionals understand compensation expectations.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that reverting to 2013 salary policies does not account for current economic conditions or may be an outdated approach to teacher compensation.
- •Some may question whether $8 million in recurring state funding is the most effective use of education dollars compared to across-the-board salary increases or other retention strategies.
- •Others might raise concerns about administrative costs of implementing the older policy or whether published salary schedules create pressure to equalize pay in ways that strain local budgets.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.