Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H471Change ✕
Food Labeling Transparency Act
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Howard PennyRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Agriculture and Environment2025-04-08
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires clear labeling of manufactured-protein food products—including cell-cultured meat and insect-based proteins—sold in North Carolina. Products using meat or poultry terminology must display qualifying terms like 'cell-cultured,' 'lab-grown,' or 'insect-based' prominently on packaging and restaurant menus to distinguish them from traditional animal-derived meat and poultry.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects consumers by ensuring transparency about what they're purchasing and eating.
- •They contend that clear labeling prevents potential deception, allows informed consumer choice, and protects traditional meat producers from unfair market competition by requiring alternative proteins to be clearly distinguished.
- •Proponents believe consumers have a right to know if products are lab-grown or insect-based rather than conventionally produced.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry the labeling requirements create unnecessary barriers for emerging alternative protein industries that could help address food security and sustainability challenges.
- •They argue the bill's strict labeling rules may unfairly stigmatize new food technologies by forcing prominent disclosure language that emphasizes unfamiliarity rather than safety or nutritional benefits.
- •Critics also question whether the requirements go beyond federal food labeling standards and create compliance burdens on manufacturers and restaurants.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.