Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref Com On Appropriations/Base Budget2025-04-01

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill increases criminal penalties for assaulting emergency responders, creates new felony charges for intentionally exposing first responders to fentanyl or harmful chemicals, and appropriates $10.35 million in grants for bulletproof vests and backpack plates for paramedics and EMTs.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects vulnerable first responders who face increasing threats while performing their duties.
• •They contend that stronger penalties deter violence against emergency workers, and that equipment grants provide necessary protective gear for paramedics and EMTs who currently lack body armor standard in other professions.
• •Proponents also note the bill addresses emerging dangers like fentanyl exposure during emergency calls.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue that the bill creates new criminal charges with broad definitions of 'expose' that could be difficult to enforce fairly or that might criminalize situations where exposure is accidental.
• •Some may question whether spending $10.35 million on protective equipment is the most effective use of state funds compared to other public safety investments, or express concerns about the appropriate scope of felony charges for exposure-related offenses.