Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S384Change ✕
2025 Safe Drinking Water Act
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Graig MeyerDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-24
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires North Carolina's Commission for Public Health to establish maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for harmful chemicals in drinking water by October 15, 2025. The bill specifically mandates MCLs for PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, hexavalent chromium, and 1,4-Dioxane, and requires annual reviews to update standards based on the latest science.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects public health by setting state limits on toxic chemicals that may already be contaminating North Carolina's drinking water.
- •They point out that other states have already established these standards, and the bill ensures vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women are protected while staying aligned with federal EPA guidelines.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that implementing strict MCLs could increase costs for water systems to test for and remove these contaminants, potentially raising water bills for consumers.
- •They might also contend that the federal EPA's current approach to regulating these substances should be sufficient, or that the tight October 2025 deadline may not allow adequate time for proper scientific review and stakeholder input.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.