Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S431Change ✕
Protect Whistleblower LEOs from Retaliation
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Lisa GrafsteinDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-25
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires law enforcement officers to intervene when they observe excessive force or other improper conduct, and to report such conduct to supervisors within 72 hours. It protects these officers from retaliation for making good-faith reports and allocates $100,000 for training criminal justice officers on these new requirements.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill strengthens accountability within law enforcement by creating a duty for officers to stop misconduct in the moment and report it afterward.
- •They contend that protecting whistleblower officers from retaliation encourages internal accountability, improves public trust in law enforcement, and establishes clear standards that officers know are expected of them when witnessing illegal or excessive conduct.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill could create operational challenges by requiring officers to intervene in split-second situations while maintaining officer safety and maintaining command structures.
- •Some may also express concerns about the breadth of reportable conduct (including vague terms like 'gross mismanagement'), the potential for false reports to burden agencies, or questions about whether internal reporting adequately addresses serious misconduct versus external oversight mechanisms.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.