Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S426Change ✕
Student Borrowers' Bill of Rights
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
David CravenRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-25
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill establishes a licensing and regulatory system for student loan servicers in North Carolina under the Commissioner of Banks, creates protections for student loan borrowers through a "Student Borrowers' Bill of Rights," and establishes a Student Loan Ombudsman position to assist borrowers and investigate complaints.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects vulnerable borrowers from unfair servicing practices by requiring servicers to be licensed, maintain minimum financial standards, and follow strict conduct rules.
- •The bill creates accountability through the Ombudsman who can investigate complaints, require servicers to respond within 20 days, and allow borrowers to sue for damages.
- •Borrowers gain explicit rights regarding payment application, income-based repayment evaluation, and clear communication when loans are transferred between servicers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the regulatory requirements increase compliance costs for servicers, which could be passed to borrowers through higher fees or reduced service availability.
- •The licensing and bonding requirements ($150,000-$500,000 depending on volume) could create barriers for smaller servicers.
- •Some may contend that federal regulation of student loans already provides sufficient oversight, and state-level regulation creates duplicative bureaucracy and complexity for national servicers operating across multiple states.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.