Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Don't Tread on Me Act
Primary Sponsor
Robert ReivesDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill creates an 'Individual Freedoms Act' that establishes legal protections against state surveillance, requires medical and political privacy in government dealings, protects parental authority, ensures education is fact-based and non-ideological, and prohibits employment and housing discrimination based on political beliefs or medical history. The bill applies a 'compelling state interest' standard, meaning the government can only restrict these rights if it has a strong reason and uses the narrowest possible means to achieve it.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects fundamental freedoms from government overreach, ensuring individuals maintain privacy in medical decisions, political beliefs, and personal conduct.
- •They contend the bill prevents discrimination and ideological coercion while preserving parental rights and ensuring education relies on factual information rather than political agendas.
- •Proponents see this as a safeguard for individual liberty and equal protection regardless of one's beliefs or medical choices.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry the bill could limit legitimate government functions like public health tracking, child welfare investigations, and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws.
- •They argue the vague language about 'ideological discrimination' and 'merit-based' hiring could weaken civil rights protections and create legal confusion about when government can act.
- •Critics also question whether restricting disclosure of medical or political information could hinder necessary government services and public safety efforts.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.