Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Save More Tatas Act
Primary Sponsor
Sydney BatchDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill expands breast cancer screening coverage requirements for health insurance plans in North Carolina by requiring equal cost-sharing for diagnostic and supplemental breast exams compared to screening mammograms, updates patient notification rules about breast density, and appropriates $3.6 million for the state health plan and $1.5 million for training mammography technologists in rural areas.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill improves access to breast cancer detection for women with dense breast tissue and high risk factors by removing financial barriers to diagnostic imaging.
- •The funding for rural mammography technologists addresses healthcare disparities by bringing screening services to underserved communities.
- •Clearer breast density notifications help patients make informed decisions about supplemental screening with their doctors.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill increases healthcare costs for insurers and employers, which could lead to higher premiums for consumers.
- •Some may question whether the state appropriations of $3.6-5 million annually are the most efficient use of public funds compared to other health priorities.
- •There could be concerns about whether the bill's requirements align with current medical guidelines or if they go beyond evidence-based screening recommendations.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.