Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Wetlands Protection and Restoration Act
Primary Sponsor
Kandie SmithDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill appropriates $15 million to the Department of Environmental Quality to establish a Wetlands Restoration and Protection Fund that supports wetland restoration projects, conservation easements, public education, and enforcement of wetland protection laws. The bill also expands North Carolina's definition of protected wetlands to include "isolated wetlands" that lost federal protection under a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decision, bringing them back under state-level protection.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects important wetlands that were previously left unprotected after the Supreme Court's Sackett decision, which removed federal oversight of isolated wetlands.
- •They contend wetlands provide critical ecosystem services including water filtration, flood control, and wildlife habitat, and that state-level protection fills a gap left by federal action.
- •Proponents also note the bill funds monitoring, research, and public education to improve wetland conservation statewide.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the $15 million appropriation represents a significant state expenditure during budget constraints and that isolated wetlands regulations could burden property owners and developers with additional permitting requirements and restrictions on land use.
- •Some may contend that the federal court decision should be respected as the proper legal framework, and that states should not unilaterally expand protections that federal courts have limited.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.