Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S488Change ✕
Clarify Disp. Place Analysis/IOLTA
EngrossedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Benton SawreyRepublicanLast Action
Failed Concur In H Com Sub2025-06-26
Vote Breakdown
1 Yea40 Nay2025-06-26
Plain Language Summary
This bill makes two main changes to North Carolina law: it requires courts to document in writing their reasoning when placing children in out-of-home care, particularly regarding community placement decisions and efforts to prevent placement; and it freezes NC IOLTA (Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts) funds from being used for grants during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, limiting their use to administrative costs only.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that requiring written findings of fact ensures judicial accountability and creates a clear record for appeals or future review of child placement decisions, protecting children's interests.
- •They contend that the IOLTA restriction ensures trust account interest funds are preserved for essential administrative functions rather than being spent on grants, maintaining the program's fiscal stability.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that written findings requirements add administrative burden to courts already managing heavy caseloads in child welfare cases.
- •They may contend that freezing IOLTA grant funding removes important resources from legal aid organizations and non-profits serving low-income North Carolinians who depend on these grants for access to justice.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.