Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Onsite Childcare for State Employees Act
Primary Sponsor
Jay ChaudhuriDemocratLast Action
Re-ref Com On Appropriations/Base Budget2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires the state to study using empty or underutilized state buildings for childcare facilities for state employees and establishes a pilot program to contract with private childcare providers to operate three childcare centers on state property. It also requires that future state building projects over $5 million with more than 250 employees include an onsite childcare or adult daycare center, unless it would delay the project by six months or increase costs by 10% or more.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill helps state employees by providing affordable, accessible childcare, which reduces work absences and improves employee retention and productivity.
- •They contend that repurposing empty state buildings is cost-efficient use of existing resources, and the apprenticeship requirement creates training opportunities in early childhood education while addressing workforce shortages in that field.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may question whether $5 million in state funding is the best use of limited taxpayer resources, especially if pilot enrollment is low or operating costs exceed projections.
- •They might argue that childcare is a private responsibility and worry about the state competing with private childcare providers, and express concerns about the quality and long-term viability of centers housed in repurposed buildings that may require expensive asbestos or lead remediation.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.