Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Kayla's Act: Protecting Dom. Violence Victims
Primary Sponsor
Lisa GrafsteinDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
Kayla's Act modifies North Carolina's domestic violence laws in three main ways: it allows statements from witnesses who were prevented from testifying by the accused to be used as evidence in court; it extends the statute of limitations for certain domestic violence misdemeanors to 10 years; and it permits domestic violence victims to testify remotely (outside the defendant's physical presence) in criminal proceedings when certain conditions are met.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects vulnerable domestic violence victims by reducing trauma and fear associated with testifying in front of their abusers, which can improve witness cooperation and case outcomes.
- •They contend the extended statute of limitations and hearsay exception help ensure abusers cannot escape accountability through intimidation or witness unavailability, and that remote testimony technology allows victims to participate safely in the justice system.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that remote testimony could undermine the defendant's right to confront witnesses face-to-face, a constitutional protection that allows defendants to observe witness credibility and demeanor directly.
- •They may also express concerns that the hearsay exception for statements from unavailable witnesses could allow evidence to be used against defendants without adequate cross-examination opportunity, or that the extended statute of limitations could result in prosecutions of older cases with degraded evidence.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.