Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-04-29

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill regulates how people can charge fees for helping veterans navigate benefits claims. It limits contingency fees to five times the monthly benefit increase, prohibits upfront charges, requires written agreements with specific disclosures, and bans aggressive solicitation and deceptive guarantees. Attorneys licensed in North Carolina are exempt from these restrictions.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects vulnerable veterans from predatory practices by unscrupulous claims representatives who overcharge or make false promises about benefits.
• •The fee caps and written agreement requirements ensure transparency and fairness, while the required disclosure informs veterans that free assistance is available through government agencies and veterans organizations.
• •This prevents exploitation of people navigating a complex system during difficult times.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may contend that strict fee regulations could discourage legitimate claims representatives from entering the field, potentially reducing available help for veterans who need professional assistance.
• •The contingency fee cap of five times one month's benefit increase could be inadequate compensation for complex cases requiring substantial work, and the restrictions on advertising and solicitation might limit veterans' awareness of available services.
• •Some argue the regulations are unnecessarily burdensome for honest practitioners.