Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
End Dual Licensure for Audiologists
Primary Sponsor
Benton SawreyRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill eliminates the requirement that audiologists, audiology technicians, and audiology assistants hold dual licenses (both an audiology license and a hearing aid dealer license) to fit or sell hearing aids in North Carolina. It also requires hearing aid sellers and audiologists to disclose to customers in writing that locked hearing aids can only be serviced at specific facilities, and establishes record-keeping requirements for these sales.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill reduces regulatory burden on audiologists by eliminating unnecessary dual licensing requirements, allowing them to practice more efficiently under a single license.
- •They also contend that the disclosure requirements for locked hearing aids increase consumer transparency, ensuring purchasers understand service limitations before buying, which protects patients from discovering restrictions after their purchase.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that eliminating dual licensure could reduce oversight of hearing aid fitting and sales, potentially weakening consumer protections if audiology and hearing aid dealer regulations differ in important ways.
- •They might also express concern that disclosure requirements alone do not address the underlying issue of locked hearing aids limiting consumer choice and access to independent service providers.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.